The correlation of consciousness and well-being may not be always obvious to everyone because superficially looking, many who are well off give the impression of their level of consciousness being low or lower than those who do not enjoy well-being. Therefore, it is important to understand exactly what is meant by this theorem.
A theorem is a rule and a demonstrable truth, or a non-self-evident scientific claim, which has been proven to be true on the basis of generally accepted statements and evidences.
The overall degree of one’s consciousness = not the same as the degree or level of awareness, education, intelligence, or morality, so it is important to understand the difference first, which we explained in the module on consciousness. The degree or level of consciousness is determined by one’s virtues and flaws, that is, by the average of all modes of consciousness in which one dwells throughout the time, as per the scale of consciousness »
As the theorem indicates, for overall success, happiness, wealth, popularity, advancement, and the like, knowledge and skills are not as crucial as virtues are – not the virtue of goodness, but all virtues. Virtues are constructive modes of consciousness.
Someone who is uneducated, untalented and incompetent can have a high level of consciousness if they are often in the mode of joy, love, faith and generally maintain high frequency. Likewise, someone who is highly educated, talented and skilled may not enjoy well-being if they are prone to destructive and non-constructive modes of consciousness, which are ranked below 200 on the scale of consciousness.
Humans are complex; they cannot be put into formulas and algorithms. Human well-being and consciousness are both more of qualitative than quantitative values, but they can also be tentatively quantified by frequencies and by kinesiological values, as well as by various other subjective evaluations. The same as the happiness index, well-being cannot be measured scientifically. There is no measuring instrument that can measure one’s well-being or one’s level of consciousness. Their values are subjective and arbitrary, but still useful.
The Theorem of Consciousness proves that it is necessary to increase the degree of our consciousness if we are to increase the degree of our well-being, both the material and the spiritual one.
The numerical value of each level of consciousness was measured by Dr. David R. Hawkins and his team, using the kinesiological method of measurement – muscle tests, which is based on scientific findings about cellular memory.
The numerical value of the level of consciousness of a person is derived from kinesiological muscle testing on a scale running from 0 to 1000. The value is than compared with the scale of consciousness.
For instance, if a specialist’s muscle test reveals that person’s level of consciousness is at, say, 500, this would mean this person’s level of consciousness is love. There is a distinction between the current mode of consciousness and the general level of consciousness, which is explained in the module on consciousness.
Most theorems, if not all, are named after their creators, so this theorem may also be named the Domin’s Consciousness Theorem. Talidari is our pen name.
Our personal proofs for the validity of this theorem consist in the measurable data of our well-being level and the level of our consciousness, which coincide.
As can be seen from the table, almost all countries (except Ireland, which is questionable since the happiness index was measured 7 years later, in 2012), which are ranked high on both benchmarks (GDP and Happiness Index) all have the collective level of consciousness (LoC) of more than 300, or mostly higher than 350, except in a couple of cases. This proves that for prosperity and happiness it is necessary to maintain your LoC above 300 or even 350, which is equally true for countries, organizations and individuals.
Rank | GDP (2005.) | Happiness Index (2012.) |
---|---|---|
1. | United States 421 | Denmark 350 |
2. | Japan 355 | Finland 400 |
3. | Germany 400 | Norway 350 |
4. | United Kingdom 410 | Netherlands 405 |
5. | China 385 | Canada 415 |
6. | France 310 | Switzerland 400 |
7. | Italy 380 (Sicily at 175) | Sweden 350 |
8. | Canada 415 | New Zealand |
9. | Spain 300 | Australia 410 |
10. | South Korea 400 | Ireland 255 |
11. | United States 421 |
As we mentioned, neither the happiness index, nor the well-being level nor the level of consciousness are scientifically and technically measurable values, so they should be looked at as fixed values. The point is to see the correlation between these values, which the Theorem of Consciousness stands for – the correlation between the level of consciousness and overall well-being level . No country with a collective LoC below 200, from Libya to Kenya, has found itself among the countries whose happiness index or GDP is high. This proves that the overall success level (whether of a country, individual or organization) is equal to the overall level of their consciousness.
For example, some people who had a very high level of consciousness before, they enjoyed great popularity, achievements and wealth at the time, and when their level of consciousness declined (due to ego – abuse of power and fame), so did everything else, in particular their well-being, which again points to the correlation that is postulated by the consciousness theorem. Some of these persons were Hitler (from 450 fell to 90), Napoleon (from 450 fell to 175 and 75), Satya Sai Baba (535 – 198), Osho (570 – 180), Sivananda (615 – 195), and others.
What modern science and ancient knowledge are telling us about the mind-body connection and the role of consciousness in physical health and overall well-being is extremely important. With emerging scientific findings on how our consciousness is influencing and creating our physical world, consciousness has shifted from being a mere passive “awareness” to being an active influencer or creator – it is in fact the very source of creation, and thus the source of well-being.
There are countless other sayings and quotes that may serve as the proofs of this theorem, since they are regarded as axioms, which is what serves as proof of a theorem. Once again, theorems are purely abstract formal statements: the proof of a theorem cannot involve experiments or other empirical evidence in the same way such evidence is used to support scientific theories.
“Virtue doesn’t come from money, but money and all other good things come from virtue.” – Socrates
If you haven’t done it already, make sure to read our related content. Further details on consciousness can be found in:
The basics of Virtuology described in detail. Virtufication fully explained. Don’t go from here without the e-book!
View Books
Take a virtual course with multimedia modules. Get inspired to activate and cultivate virtues. Enroll in our e-course!
View Courses
Virtuologues provide a 5-star
mentoring and consulting
online, offline and by phone.
Get answers to your questions:
Contact